Who Said This?
What Christian missionary said the following:
“We never try to convert those who receive [aid from our mission] to Christianity but in our work we bear witness to the love of God’s presence and if Catholics, Protestants, Buddhists, or agnostics become for this better men — simply better — we will be satisfied. It matters to the individual what church he belongs to. If that individual thinks and believes that this is the only way to God for her or him, this is the way God comes into their life — his life. If he does not know any other way and if he has no doubt so that he does not need to search then this is his way to salvation.”
Give up? It was Mother Teresa. She wrote it in her book, "Life in the Spirit: Reflections, Meditations and Prayers." Quotes like that make you wonder. In John 14:6 it reads:
Jesus told him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me."
If a Christian, especially a Christian missionary says otherwise - they are wrong. Mother Teresa in this quote states a form of Universalism that is prevalent in American culture today. All faiths are equal, all faiths bring us closer to the Lord. If you believe truthfully in your faith you will realize this sentiment is false.
Few faiths at their core actually teach that type of universalistic salvation. They teach their individual truth. Christianity is no different - it teaches that through Christ alone is our salvation obtained. A missionary like Mother Teresa should have known better.
Now, I do not pretend to know if in her heart of hearts she believed in true universalism or other false doctrines, but that specific quote is troubling. What's the point of mission work if not to spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ to the corners of the Earth? If you are telling these people they don't need Christ, but can focus instead on their household gods as a way to get "close to God," you are teaching false doctrine. This may be controversial and this may offend some, but it needs to be said. If a Christian leader says something false, it needs to be pointed out. This is an untruth in the Christian faith.
Perhaps this is an isolated comment. Perhaps this book was ghostwritten. But if this was in her heart of hearts, Christ was not the center of her mission work - people were.
EDIT: 1:18 PM EST - Some of my Catholic friends on Twitter sprung to the defense of Mother Teresa stating that in the context of her life she was getting at something different - that the Lord will use anything and everything to find us right where we are. I agree with that sentiment, but as I told them - I do not see that sentiment in the aforementioned quote. Maybe I'm missing something and if so, I apologize for taking something out of a larger context. My Catholic friends would probably understand her in context better than I as they are of her church.
That said, I stand by my opposition to universalism. And, as I stated up there, I can not pretend to know the true heart of Mother Teresa, I can only know what she said. This is how I interpreted her statement. If you have other interpretations, feel free to add them to the comments section.
The Books of Solomon
In my tour through the Bible, I recently finished reading through the books of Solomon: Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and Song of Songs (Song of Solomon). Each book is different, but each book provides us insight into Solomon - the wisest man who ever lived.
Proverbs provides us wisdom and insight. Some basic, and some detailed. Much of Proverbs can be taken with individual verses on their own as opposed to read continuously. There are many a great verse, many a great piece of wisdom from the wise Solomon. Here are a few that I like from the Holman Christian Standard translation:
"Even a fool is considered wise when he keeps silent, discerning when he seals his lips."
-Proverbs 17:28"A man who finds a wife finds a good thing and obtains favor from the Lord."
-Proverbs 18:22"A man who does not control his temper is like a city whose wall is broken down."
-Proverbs 25:28
As I said - the wisdom of Solomon is obvious in this book and worth reading through for great insight into man and the Lord.
I jump to the third of these books next, Song of Solomon (Song of Songs). This is a book that is a back and forth discussion between a woman and her love (with the women of Jerusalem talking in between providing commentary). The story is about the love between a man and his wife, it's beautiful romantic love poetry. At times it's sensual, at times it details the beauty that the wife and husband find for one another. There is a reason this is in the Bible. This reminds us that love making / sex within the confines of marriage is a beautiful thing, something not to be ashamed of. Sorry to the Shakers, but the Lord designed us that way. Solomon knew that and despite his lust of women (hundreds of wives & concubines), he provided us this wonderful insight into a truly loving marriage.
Now the middle book of Solomon is Ecclesiastes. I put it in the middle because at times I find it to be the most important reminder. The author is identified as a King of Israel, son of David, and incredibly wise - i.e. Solomon. What does Solomon tell us in Ecclesiastes? He tells us about all the things under the sun that he invested in - money, additional wisdom, women, food, drink, and "things." What did he find after years of trying it all? Emptiness.
Solomon did it all, had it all. Yet, in the end - that was nothing compared to the most important thing in life - the Lord. Fear of the Lord, a relationship with the Lord - these are more important than anything. It seemed to take Solomon his entire life to realize this simple truth - the Lord should be the center of your life.
Paul reminds us of this as well in Philippians. In Philippians 3:7-8, Paul wrote:
But everything that was a gain to me, I have considered to be a loss because of Christ. More than that, I also consider everything to be a loss in view of the surpassing value of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord. Because of Him I have suffered the loss of all things and consider them filth, so that I may gain Christ
The truth is that all of Ecclesiastes can be summarized in these two verses. All that you thought was gain was nothing, filth as Paul put it. All that matters is your personal relationship with Christ. That does not mean that the things of this world are not worth investing in, but they must not distract you from your relationship with the Lord. If something pulls you away from Him, forget about it. It took Solomon his whole life to realize this truth, I pray that you are able to understand it now.
As I always end these posts - I ask that you join me in reading the Bible cover to cover. It is different than jumping around from book to book - you begin to see the big picture of the Lord as we go through in order. The Lord inspired men to compile these books in this specific order to reveal Himself to us. Allow the Lord of the universe to reveal Himself to you.
Poll of Christians: How Many Of These Do You Believe In?
Here is a new poll for my Christian friends on a set of theological ideals. Here are a list of ideas:
- Total depravity - Man is sinful by his nature and incapable of fighting it on their own
- Election of saints - The Lord selected specific people and only them to be saved. Those not chosen receive the just wrath of the Lord
- Limited atonement - Christ's death on the cross shall atone the sins of those pre-selected by the Lord to be His (see previous bullet).
- Irresistible grace of the Lord - Those selected by the Lord to be His will not be able to reject Him. Eventually, they will accept Christ no matter what they have done in their life.
- Eternal security - Those who were pre-selected by the Lord to be His will always, no matter their sin, be forgiven and saved. Those who are pre-ordained can not lose their salvation in Christ.
These are the 5 points of Calvinism, summarized.

After reading my summaries, how many of them do you believe in?
More on Land and On Statistical Relevancy
Yesterday I posted up a piece entitled, "Land Wars" which linked to a number of important pieces on the of Dr. Richard Land and his unhelpful comments from Southern Baptist leaders. Today, I just need to add a little more to it.
First, regarding the Reverends Jackson and Sharpton. They are race baiters, their techniques are questionable at best and detrimental to race relations at worst. That said, if the Martin family requested their presence and these Pastors obliged, I can't really begrudge them for doing so. I can not say if their motivations were based on the request of the Martin family or for their own edification, but being asked by a grieving family makes their presence, to me, less of an issue. Also, this became national news because national news media like controversy and want to make things more controversial. See the scandal at MSNBC manipulating the 911 calls for more.
Second, Dr. Land used statistics to try to defend his support of racial profiling. He spouted statistics specifically stating that black men are "...statistically more likely to do you harm than a white man." The problem? Correlation does not imply causality - one of the first things you are taught when you take any course on statistics. Ed Stetzer reminds us of the classic example from Bob Spunt's piece in Psychology in Action:
It is known that throughout the year, murder rates and ice cream sales are highly correlated. That is, as murder rates rise so does the sale of ice cream. There are three possible explanations:
Possibility #1: Murders cause people to purchase ice cream...
Possibility #2: Purchasing ice cream causes people to murder or get murdered...
Possibility #3: There is a third variable-- a confounding variable-- which causes the increase in BOTH ice cream sales AND murder rates. For instance, the weather... When it's hot in the Summer, people spend more time outside interacting with each other, and hence are more likely to get into the kinds of situations that lead to murder. They are also probably buying ice cream.
There are so many variables at play especially when comparing things like crime rates to race that statistics like the one Land may use are irrelevant at best and misleading / harmful at worst. More multi-time sex offenders are white males - does that mean that we need to assume white males could sexually assault you? Of course not - there is a correlation, but it does not imply a cause. Cause is never implied by statistics and Land seemed to imply a cause with his statistical use specifically regarding the Martin case.
Third, Land appears to have plagiarized some of his commentary on the Trayvon Martin case. The SBC is investigating that now and, frankly, the head of our Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission shouldn't be doing something unethical. I do not feel I need to say more on that specific topic.
Fourth, was making commentary on this topic and claiming to speak for the bulk of Southern Baptists really his role? The role of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission is "...to awaken, inform, energize, equip, and mobilize Christians to be the catalysts for the Biblically-based transformation of their families, churches, communities, and the nation." Meaning? The organization is to inform the public on religious liberty and moral values based public policy issues, and to lobby on behalf of the faithful for those issues of religious liberty and moral values. In which of these roles does providing commentary about race and the Trayvon Martin case fall? None of them. He could speak on his own behalf, but frankly in a high profile role of leadership in the Southern Baptist Convention he has held since 1988 he should have known that his comments still will be considered the views of the Convention. It displayed a lack of discernment on his part. It's not that leaders of the convention can not hold opinions or even speak on racial relations, but we need discernment before speaking on the topic. Why? Both because of the past of the organization and because of perception in the modern media. I am tired of seeing the media label my chosen denomination racist because of the inartful comments of one person.
Finally, honestly - we have no idea what happened between Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman. We don't know what went on in either of their minds or hearts. Let the justice system sort it out just like it is designed.
I will try not to talk much further on the topic of Dr. Land. Land has done a great deal of good for the Convention in the past and for reconciliation for race relations in the church. He should be commended for that. That said, if the plagiarism charges are true and with his recent commentary, it may be wise to find a new voice for the ERLC and ask Land to retire from this role.
Land Wars
Dr. Richard Land of the Southern Baptist Convention's Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission made some comments on race and the Travyon Martin case that have caused quite the stir. There is a reason they caused a stir, because his comments were racially insensitive. Numerous Southern Baptist bloggers have commented more eloquently on the topic, as such - I'll link to them:
- Dave Miller of SBC Voices
- Ed Stetzer of Lifeway Research
- Dr. William Dwight McKissic, Sr.
- Doug Hibbard of SBC Voices
Bottom Line: Whether we agree with Land or not, he appears in the public to speak for the convention. As such, the SBC has a responsibility to respond to his actions / comments. He made a public apology, but did not really apologize for the content of what he said, only that he offended. Other Southern Baptists need to step up and say that what he said was wrong and frankly, he had no place talking about this issue whatsoever in his role. And Ed Stetzer is right in saying, "...[T]he Southern Baptist Convention itself has not yet gained the moral authority to speak with full credibility on issues of race." We need to be careful about what we as a body of believers say - there are still raw feelings about the SBC and rightly so, but we are on the whole a good body of believers that love Christ.
I have been a member of the Southern Baptist Convention for nearly 4 years now. In our church's current state we have seen rotating Pastors come through giving guest sermons until we have picked an interim pastor. Our congregation is 99% white with a number of aging congregants. We have had white guest preachers and black guest preachers, in either case they were treated the same and treated as brothers and sisters in Christ. I have rarely seen such a body of believers who recognize our differences, but allow them to divide whatsoever. When a local predominantly black National Baptist church burned down, our church reached out in Christian love inviting them to our church. Reaching out to all of our fellow laborers in Christ is important. I hope all the churches of the SBC get to the point where all members treated equally for we are all weak and all fall short of the glory of the Lord. None of us are perfect - all of us are weak and in His eyes we are all brothers and sisters. Let us not forget the old children's song, "red and yellow, black and white, we are precious in His sight." To the Lord, we truly all are - let's treat each other that way.
